One of the most surprising events to come out of Trump's first week in office is the rising up of Forest Rangers in national parks.
On January 20th the National Park Service retweeted a side-by-side photo of the crowds at Obama's 2009 inauguration and Trump's. Soon after they were banned from tweeting.
In less than 24 hours the NPS tweeted an apology and the Twitter account has been up and running since. As a side effect of this temporary shut down and ban was the creation of an alternative account aptly named AltUSNPS (@altusnps). They claim to be forest rangers from national parks all across the nation.
The Alt USNPS account is not holding back, climate change is the foremost topic covered and now they have created stickers and t-shirts with a brand new "alt" logo for purchase. All proceeds of these items go to the National Park Foundation which is even better. If you are curious for more info you can follow them on Twitter or email them altusnps@gmail.com.
Then on January 24th I posted the following article:
USDA scrambles to ease concerns after researchers were ordered to stop publishing news releases
NPS was not the only entity asked to stopped sharing scientific information about climate change and this has many on their toes.
Keep an eye out for the March for Science. Dates have not been set yet, but you can sign up here.
Update: The March will take place on Earth Day, April 22, 2017.
There is a lot more information I could share on this topic, but I have chosen to leave it at the beginnings and follow it more from there. Please leave your comments, thanks for reading!
Instead of spewing my opinion all over Facebook I decided to move my rants to a blog. I hope to create a dialog and not angry arguments. Please leave your comments - whether you agree or not - because how else can I see someone else's view without your input. Thanks for visiting!
Tuesday, January 31, 2017
Monday, January 30, 2017
Department of Ed. - Secretary of Education
In January I started sharing a lot of articles and information about my political beliefs on Facebook. In the few weeks since I have realized that it may not be the best place to make these statements, so I am moving some of my FB posts to this Blog to continue the work. Some may be a bit outdated but I want to keep track of where I am going here and where I would like to end up.
January 18:
I promised myself I would not work for a for-profit school ever again. Their priorities are not for the students, but for making money. DeVos and her ties to K12 Inc. make me nervous, and that's just a start.
The article that was attached:
Betsy DeVos' confirmation hearing went off the rails
My teaching career goes back a handful of years (or more!) and I have worked for many types of schools. Starting in public school, in a highly populated city near low-income housing, was a shock to me. Yes, I am white and yes, I grew up in an affluent community - I had no idea what I was getting into. It was a struggle to stay and I started to doubt my passion for teaching - could I even do this? So I left and took a very long break.
After more than a year I decided I could not see myself anywhere else, so I started applying to schools again. My goal was to find an online school - I needed to try something different than a typical classroom. Soon I was hired at my "dream job!" The students were online but they came to school everyday. It was a way to build relationships with them, but give them an alternative environment to learn. I was part of something I had never heard of before either - our school was partnered with a for-profit organization that handled our HR and budgets. We were disliked by our district and after many struggles they just the school down (after I had moved on to work overseas).
After leaving the online school I started to learn a lot more about the situation I was in - a for-profit school! Who ever heard of such a thing! Reading about the "umbrella" corporation really opened my eyes to what I was a part of and made me glad to leave. Tax dollars were being funneled right into the CEO, CFO's etc pockets for their own benefit, but what about my students? That was not the purpose of the school, so maybe the district was right to shut them down (my big complaint is they dropped the ball on redirecting our students to other schools).
So, when Betsy DeVos came across my radar I knew that this could only be bad. Her stance for for-profit schools means that our tax money will go into the pockets of fat cats. I have so many questions that I could ask:
a. How does she think school vouchers will work for rural populations?
Her response in the above linked article was all about distance learning, but from experience this does not work for all students.
b. How will school continue to perform if voucher students start to leave in droves? How will this effect the staff and remaining students if funding dwindles?
c. Are they other ways she can see the public school system being improved?
d. What would be done with the new Common Core Curriculum?
e. How can she encourage non-profits within the charter school systems?
f. Will she work hard to find out more about important policies that effect public schools and colleges (e.g. sexual assault policies and the IDEA, to name a few)?
Her answers, mentioned in the above linked article, showed insufficient knowledge on both topics.
Tomorrow, January 31, the Senate will vote whether or not to confirm her as Secretary of Ed.
Progressives launch last-minute push against Betsy DeVos, and conservatives counter with online ad campaign
Please add your comments for or against Betsy DeVos.
Thanks for reading!
Update January 31: Betsy DeVos has been confirmed by the committee and will now stand to be confirmed by the Senate.
January 18:
I promised myself I would not work for a for-profit school ever again. Their priorities are not for the students, but for making money. DeVos and her ties to K12 Inc. make me nervous, and that's just a start.
The article that was attached:
Betsy DeVos' confirmation hearing went off the rails
My teaching career goes back a handful of years (or more!) and I have worked for many types of schools. Starting in public school, in a highly populated city near low-income housing, was a shock to me. Yes, I am white and yes, I grew up in an affluent community - I had no idea what I was getting into. It was a struggle to stay and I started to doubt my passion for teaching - could I even do this? So I left and took a very long break.
After more than a year I decided I could not see myself anywhere else, so I started applying to schools again. My goal was to find an online school - I needed to try something different than a typical classroom. Soon I was hired at my "dream job!" The students were online but they came to school everyday. It was a way to build relationships with them, but give them an alternative environment to learn. I was part of something I had never heard of before either - our school was partnered with a for-profit organization that handled our HR and budgets. We were disliked by our district and after many struggles they just the school down (after I had moved on to work overseas).
After leaving the online school I started to learn a lot more about the situation I was in - a for-profit school! Who ever heard of such a thing! Reading about the "umbrella" corporation really opened my eyes to what I was a part of and made me glad to leave. Tax dollars were being funneled right into the CEO, CFO's etc pockets for their own benefit, but what about my students? That was not the purpose of the school, so maybe the district was right to shut them down (my big complaint is they dropped the ball on redirecting our students to other schools).
So, when Betsy DeVos came across my radar I knew that this could only be bad. Her stance for for-profit schools means that our tax money will go into the pockets of fat cats. I have so many questions that I could ask:
a. How does she think school vouchers will work for rural populations?
Her response in the above linked article was all about distance learning, but from experience this does not work for all students.
b. How will school continue to perform if voucher students start to leave in droves? How will this effect the staff and remaining students if funding dwindles?
c. Are they other ways she can see the public school system being improved?
d. What would be done with the new Common Core Curriculum?
e. How can she encourage non-profits within the charter school systems?
f. Will she work hard to find out more about important policies that effect public schools and colleges (e.g. sexual assault policies and the IDEA, to name a few)?
Her answers, mentioned in the above linked article, showed insufficient knowledge on both topics.
Tomorrow, January 31, the Senate will vote whether or not to confirm her as Secretary of Ed.
Progressives launch last-minute push against Betsy DeVos, and conservatives counter with online ad campaign
Please add your comments for or against Betsy DeVos.
Thanks for reading!
Update January 31: Betsy DeVos has been confirmed by the committee and will now stand to be confirmed by the Senate.
ACA (Obamacare) and the first efforts of our new senators
In January I started sharing a lot of articles and information about my political beliefs on Facebook. In the few weeks since I have realized that it may not be the best place to make these statements, so I am moving some of my FB posts to this Blog to continue the work. Some may be a bit outdated but I want to keep track of where I am going here and where I would like to end up.
Here is my first political post of 2017 (Jan. 4):
Here is my first political post of 2017 (Jan. 4):
I have family members and students that have benefited from the ACA, I'm really worried about what is going to happen if it's fully repealed and there's no back up plan. Are they going to leave those in need floundering for health care?!?!
A close family member was paying $700 a month or more before ACA and even though the premiums are going up the monthly payment is significantly less than before, it's perfect for a fixed budget. If ACA goes away insurance won't be affordable again

The first act of some senators - even before they were confirmed - was to attack the ACA. Here is the article that was posted with the above statement:
I agree that the Affordable Care Act is not perfect, but it has set us on the right path. Making changes and updates to the system could make it better.
What I think has gone right:
a. Allowing 26 year olds to still be a part of their parents' insurance plans (this would have been great for me after college, sometimes you just need a few years to get fully on your feet).
b. Requiring health insurers to take on people with existing conditions (I have known family and friends with existing conditions who have, in the past, frequently had trouble getting affordable health insurance (or even insurance at all)).
c. Creating a competitive market for people to find insurance that can match their needs (My husband and I took advantage of this for several months during a major life change).
d. Encouraging, ok, pretty much requiring, people to have insurance (there are plenty of twenty-somethings that just do not opt in and when they are sick and cannot pay, taxpayers do anyway).
This list can go on and on, but these 4 immediately come to my mind as to why it has been effective.
A second FB post from January 12:
Approximately 1 in 18 people in the US is currently benefiting from Obamacare (ACA). No matter if you are for or against the Senate shutting it down I highly recommend finding someone benefiting from it right now and asking them about pros and cons.
Here's the article too:
Currently I know several people taking advantage of ACA, please share your stories as to why it's helpful to you or your family.
There are several people that I know whom are against it too, please share your stories here too.
Thanks for reading!
😓
Labels:
ACA,
Democrats,
Greens,
health care,
Liberals,
Obamacare,
politics,
Republicans,
USA
Yep, I voted Green
In the year 2000, when I able to cast my very first presidential vote I did a ton of research. I could not believe how many people were running for president! Diligently I took now most of the names and began my slow research on each one.
Quickly I learned that Bush would not be my choice. Reading more about Al Gore I thought maybe, but then I moved onto the Green party candidate and the Libertarian party candidate, and so on and so forth. Each of these parties had something I could agree with and a lot that I could not justify. Do I remember whom I voted for that year? No. But I do know that's the first time I realized there were more than just 2 choices.
Each presidential voting year after that I did the same thing - I have since narrowed it down to checking out Democrats, Republicans, Greens, and Liberals (although I did have to research McMullin this year). Greens continually stick out to me - for the most part I agree with what they stand for and how they could improve this country.
The past 2 presidential campaigns have led me straight to the Green candidate, Jill Stein. Yes, there are still things I do not completely agree with within the Green party but for the most part I think that they have the right ideas.
Many will say that I am throwing my vote away, but I have to go with my gut. Voting for the "least of two evils" seems like a waste of a vote. How can you justify that to yourself? Can you imagine if everyone voted with their "gut?" I think the US would be headed in a very different direction.
Please send your feedback. I am hoping to encourage healthy discussions of ideas and thoughts about our government, voting systems, etc etc.
Thanks for reading!
Quickly I learned that Bush would not be my choice. Reading more about Al Gore I thought maybe, but then I moved onto the Green party candidate and the Libertarian party candidate, and so on and so forth. Each of these parties had something I could agree with and a lot that I could not justify. Do I remember whom I voted for that year? No. But I do know that's the first time I realized there were more than just 2 choices.
Each presidential voting year after that I did the same thing - I have since narrowed it down to checking out Democrats, Republicans, Greens, and Liberals (although I did have to research McMullin this year). Greens continually stick out to me - for the most part I agree with what they stand for and how they could improve this country.
The past 2 presidential campaigns have led me straight to the Green candidate, Jill Stein. Yes, there are still things I do not completely agree with within the Green party but for the most part I think that they have the right ideas.
Many will say that I am throwing my vote away, but I have to go with my gut. Voting for the "least of two evils" seems like a waste of a vote. How can you justify that to yourself? Can you imagine if everyone voted with their "gut?" I think the US would be headed in a very different direction.
Please send your feedback. I am hoping to encourage healthy discussions of ideas and thoughts about our government, voting systems, etc etc.
Thanks for reading!
Friday, January 27, 2017
I don't want to shove my opinions down your throat
![]() |
I voted and now I want to tear sh** up! |
Since November half the US has been grieving for our political system. For me, January 20th set it off and I can't seem to stop researching topics and posting about them on Facebook. I have decided that's not what I want to do - shove my opinions down everyone's throat on FB - so here's my new blog.
The purpose is to encourage discourse. Yes, I have one opinion and you may have another - can you explain to me why you think that way? Your life story may be very different than mine and I am unable to see your viewpoint, so please share it with me!
I am a liberal of sorts and have found that the majority of my family are conservatives - how did that happen?
Thanks for reading!
Labels:
Clinton,
Democrats,
Greens,
Liberals,
politics,
Republicans,
Stein. Johnson,
Trump,
USA
Location:
Denver, CO, USA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)